The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 22:47, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pogroms carried out by Arabs against Jews[edit]

Pogroms carried out by Arabs against Jews (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The PROD was removed, thus I cannot re-PROD it. This is essentially a one-sentence definition-like stub; the title is problematic (Arabs? all of them? Some?), and the sentence then says "Muslims". The PROD was removed because the topic was deemed notable -- it possibly is, but this stub doesn't even define exactly what said topic is supposed to be. The merge discussion which is supposedly taking place somewhere was about merging a different article which has since been deleted.

As it stands, this page conflates Arab and Muslim, and places it next to the antisemitism-box. I suggest deleting this short thing until people can figure out what the correct title should be and what the exact topic is. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 18:27, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:44, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:44, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:44, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:45, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Interchangable use of "Arab" and "Muslim" in the article is factually erroneous. Carrite (talk) 01:28, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
As I pointed out on the article's talk page, the word pogrom is applicable here as per the definition at pogrom. Joe407 (talk) 09:38, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
According the definition used at pogrom the two 20th century incidents do not qualify as such. The earliest example, from the 11th century probably doesn't either. A pogrom is not just a massacre, it is a massacre "either approved or condoned by government or military authorities," according to the entry.Griswaldo (talk) 13:40, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"either approved or condoned by government or military authorities," - As this was often the case, I believe that this was the reason this word is used in the article title. It is a similar question to should an article be called "Death of X", "Murder of X", or "Execution of X". Joe407 (talk) 09:27, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.