The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deletion as unambiguous promotion. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:32, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pol-primett (project)[edit]

Pol-primett (project) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article de-prodded by creator without giving a reason or improving the article. Original PROD reason still stands: "Ephemeral project. No independent sources. Does not meet WP:GNG." Hence: Delete. Crusio (talk) 10:25, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep- A major, multinational EU funded program is notable. Metal theft is a significant issue. Wxidea (talk) 22:59, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Could you perhaps also say why an EU funded program is notable? Yes, the problem addressed (metal theft) is notable, but that doesn't make this program notable. Is there significant coverage in independent reliable sources? How does this project that will exist for a few years only at this point meet any of the criteria of WP:GNG? --Crusio (talk) 00:43, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:58, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.