The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Dori ☾Talk ☯ Contribs☽ 23:20, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Porno Valley

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable; no independent & reliable refs. (Contested Prod) Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 23:19, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no evidence of mention in reliable third-party sources, does not meet the general notability guideline. JoshuSasori (talk) 01:13, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Did you even look at the find sources link? Morbidthoughts (talk) 08:05, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, and found nothing. JoshuSasori (talk) 08:33, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:42, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:42, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Based on these sources satisfying the gng [1][2][3] Morbidthoughts (talk) 08:06, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Both refs 1 and 3 are passing mentions of the TV series, and quite definitely do not count as significant coverage. Regarding ref 2, I can't read Italian but the name "Porno Valley" is used in other contexts, is this article specifically about the television series? JoshuSasori (talk) 08:33, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oops copy and pasted the wrong link since I had multiple tabs open while looking at the sources. The documentary is discussed extensively in [4] but it's not available without academic access or pay. Morbidthoughts (talk) 22:02, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK, but is that paper specifically about Porno Valley? The introduction mentions that there are 230 sex documentaries. I'm not sure they are doing more than using Porno Valley as an example, and it isn't clear why Porno Valley is notable. Also, is there any other coverage elsewhere? JoshuSasori (talk) 01:20, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Porno Valley, Family Business, and The Girls Next Door are the documentaries she focuses on in her criticism and analysis. As for other coverage, [5][6][7] Morbidthoughts (talk) 07:30, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, great research by Morbidthoughts (talk · contribs), excellent work. — Cirt (talk) 22:41, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Good research; i think it's enough to meet Wikipedia:GNG. — ΛΧΣ21™ 00:18, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – the links provided by Morbidthoughts can be used to put together a article passing WP:GNG. —WP:PENGUIN · ^{[ TALK ]} 10:18, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.