The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  20:38, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Postulatism[edit]

Postulatism (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Term doesn't appear in Google Scholar nor JSTOR, possible hoax. Notability questionable even if it isn't. Created seven years ago by an SPA. A couple blind hits... just a couple, in Google Books. j⚛e decker^talk 16:26, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:34, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:34, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - This hovers somewhere between WP:OR, WP:MADEUP, and redundant to a whole host of -isms that factor in the problem of proving facts about the world or communicating knowledge or knowing something for certain... (see relativism, subjectivism, perspectivism, brain in a vat, solipsism...). Also, fails GNG. --— Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 19:20, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - not yet notable fringey idea. Bearian (talk) 22:21, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.