The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 08:18, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Powerful Stuff (public information film)[edit]

Powerful Stuff (public information film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable public info film. Nothing found in a WP:BEFORE except one article that listed the film as "scary". Last nomination ended in no consensus as there was no participation in the discussion. Donaldd23 (talk) 00:24, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Donaldd23 (talk) 00:24, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Donaldd23 (talk) 00:24, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Then surely it shouldn't be hard to find a reliable source for that claim? Spiderone 11:36, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
How does that source demonstrate either WP:NFILM or WP:GNG? Spiderone 11:36, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I definitely agree. Unless we can find a reliable source for this article, we'll just delete the article. --TPercival (talk) 12:20, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.