- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Lourdes 08:31, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Pradip Neupane[edit]
- Pradip Neupane (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unreliable reference Binod Basnet (talk) 08:29, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. While the nominator has made no valid argument for deletion, a search for evidence of notability found nothing. --Michig (talk) 09:00, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete While the 'unreliable reference' in the article isn't itself a valid reason to delete, I can't find any mentions anywhere apart from self-publicising websites, so seems to fail notability. GirthSummit (blether) 14:12, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not notable.Azkord (talk) 08:22, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 15:10, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 15:10, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not notable without reliable sources Alex-h (talk) 09:32, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.