The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete. G11ed. (non-admin closure) WBGconverse 10:26, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Prandex[edit]

Prandex (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not satisfy corporate notability or product notabillity. Google search shows that Prandex exists and uses the Internet extensively, but does not show independent coverage.

The purpose of the article appears to be to promote the product, and not to describe either the product or the company notably. A neutral article doesn't need to list multiple personnel.

Of the five references, three are identical, and are probably paid advertisements, and one is an opportunity to subscribe to a newsletter. Robert McClenon (talk) 08:20, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 09:07, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 09:07, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.