The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:12, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Prashanth Venkataramanujam

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can only find a trivial mention in one reliable source, the rest of the sources are puff-pieces, SPS or directory listing. Fails WP:BIO by a country mile. Would warrent a line on the One Fine Day! article. Cameron Scott (talk) 09:41, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete - nothing there of substance; fails WP:ENTERTAINER, etc. --Orange Mike | Talk 13:22, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, doesn't appear to meet WP:ENTERTAINER, can see no significant coverage in reliable sources. Minor mention in the Chicago Sun-Times, but no significant coverage.--Beloved Freak 13:48, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, I agree with Cameron Scott, it warrents a line in the One Fine Day! article, but he has not reached notability outside the Midwest at this time. I do not recommend a title lock however as it is possible he may gain notability in the future. Fkick (talk) 8:48 , 14 May 2010 (PST)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:19, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.