The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. v/r - T P 00:31, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

PrimeFaces[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A specialised software library with no evidence of notability. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:22, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

how i can prove it? here, there are some companies who uses primefaces library: http://www.primefaces.org/who/uses.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.214.36.178 (talk) 08:23, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 18:10, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No "significant coverage" in reliable sources, no indication of notability, created by an SPA, so possibly spam/promotional. Dialectric (talk) 13:53, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.