The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was ~~speedy~~ delete. ~~Speedy Delete, A7~~ (not so speedy as it turns out) Jac16888 ^Talk 19:10, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Prince Richardson[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Actor of no detectable notability. A few minor roles; nothing of any significance. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 18:45, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 20:32, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 20:34, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete if this is the same person already twice deleted as Brandon Richardson, otherwise delete for failing WP:NACTOR. Minor actor with no significant roles. Clarityfiend (talk) 20:50, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no significant coverage, fails Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Entertainers as well as the WP:GNG. An IP editor removed the Afd notice on the article at 20:25, 2 August 2014; I have restored it. Yes, Clarityfiend, it looks like the same Brandon Richardson to me, so I would endorse Speedy deletion as a G-4, except those were both speedy A-7's, no discussion. --Bejnar (talk) 21:19, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nom. and above. --Jersey92 (talk) 00:01, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I believe this article is notable and relevant. If has reliable sources and links, I have view a few articles such as http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Bates_(actor) without any references a reliable source. This article does and I seen another article is all jacked up and his link are dead links also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Young_Cartoon. If you have allow those articles, you can allow this one as well. Please what make those article more reliable than the one I wrote. Iranmichealswiki (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 04:40, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the informative essays at Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions#What about article x? and Wikipedia:Other stuff exists. --Bejnar (talk) 04:53, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Notable organization as per the sources in the article and as outlined above. Jtaylor03 (talk) — Jtaylor03 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
Delete fails WP:ENTERTAINER. Magnolia677 (talk) 20:03, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep. I added many reliable sources to prove notability. And provide a strong argument towards similar articles like Paul Bates, Brittney Wilson, and Young Cartoon which met WP:PG and WP:Notability with no reliable sources. --- Iranmicheals^t@lk 01:40, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment One !vote per person, please. And none of the sources that have been added to the article amount to significant coverage. Provide a single article that discusses Richardson in depth, in a reliable source, and maybe we could reconsider, but no such source has come forth. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 03:50, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The added sources do not support notability. They consist of things like an uploaded DD Form 214 (discharge), and cast & crew lists. --Bejnar (talk) 15:18, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Article has been moved to Brandon Q' Richardson since this discussion was started. Closing admin: please delete both articles if that is the outcome of the discussion. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 19:09, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.