The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 01:01, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pro-Pain Pro Wrestling[edit]

Pro-Pain Pro Wrestling (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Fails WP:ORG. Tagged for numerous problems 2 months ago and no response. Plenty of statements that have no sources and could well fail WP:OR !! Justa Punk !! 12:31, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletions. —User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 13:16, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep a Google search seems to show likely notability, though the lack of news coverage is worrisome. Needs WP:RS. JJL (talk) 14:32, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 13:23, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, for now anyway. Nikki311 18:31, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Notable pro wrestling company. Kris (talk) 02:26, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.