- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 11:42, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Probiotherapy[edit]
- Probiotherapy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NOTESSAY, statements such as "Generally it is believed"... lots of WP:OR JMHamo (talk) 10:03, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 10:08, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 10:08, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete (albeit with a somewhat different rationale, since I'm not sure OR can be the main reason for deletion). The article should demonstrate WP:GNG is met - through non-primary sources, of course - and it seems to me that the non-primary sources in question do not discuss "probiotherapy" as a term at all (since they all predate what the article declares to be the first use of the term in 2017). At best this is a merge to microbiota, but there is barely anything to merge. GregorB (talk) 10:48, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: The "article" is not very coherent, and the term is a neologism invented in "May 2017 by a Belgian biotech company, YUN NV". This is not generally notable. Imaginatorium (talk) 11:43, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: marketing fluff, neologism, vacuous account, not notable. If there's anything in here, it's also already in other articles. Time to ... disinfect. Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:16, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Opionated, marking and not notable = no go --Sau226 (talk) 11:45, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.