The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 11:58, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Prostitute Disfigurement (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Prostitute Disfigurement is a real Dutch band that has performed just is not particularly notable. I have conducted a comprehensive though not all-encompassing WP:BEFORE. I have found passing mentions in the general press (concert lineups) and a few general listings and articles on extremely specific websites. By my analysis fails WP:BAND and even the WP:GNG. This AfD is in continuation to two of the band's albums that were nominated by other editors. gidonb (talk) 01:30, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. gidonb (talk) 01:30, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. gidonb (talk) 01:30, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 January 14. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:55, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - They got some gig announcements in various local publications [1], some uninformative introductions in magazines like Blabbermouth [2] and Decibel [3], and an occasional specialist album review [4]. Those are all minor tidbits showing that the band got a little notice, but not enough to reach the significant and reliable coverage requirements for notability in Wikipedia. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 14:29, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment One of their albums has been reviewed by Metal.de, which is a reliable source (it is not listed at WP:ALBUMAVOID, but other editors also said it's reliable). GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 14:41, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep, total output on reasonably big enough labels seems to indicate a weak meeting of WP:NBAND. Although the band's lyrics/themes seem atrocious. Geschichte (talk) 09:22, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - I don’t think it’s possible to improve this article to a reasonable state as there just isn’t the source material. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 11:38, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.