The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. clear consensus DGG ( talk ) 06:45, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Puppala complex[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a commercial building with no references and no indication of notability. Keihatsu ^talk 08:42, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:26, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:26, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Does not meet notability criteria.--Dwaipayan (talk) 00:43, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Scarcely even an article. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:24, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 00:09, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Building with no indication of importance. No sources at all. Run-of-the-mill commercial complex.--xanchester (t) 05:02, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Mall with no indication of notability. The Interior (Talk) 08:36, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.