The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 00:17, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pyorrhoea[edit]

Pyorrhoea (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Fails WP:MUSIC standards. Non notable label and google hits only show few band links, while the other links are about the disease. Delete Undeath (talk) 05:01, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Side note: link to a Polish Empire Records (label) has been red-linked already. -- User:Poeticbent
The criteria you're citing says that a group may be notable if they have "been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent from the musician/ensemble itself and reliable". Can you prove that NeuFutur complies with WP:RS, and offer other links (to comply with the demand for "multiple non-trivial published works")? LuciferMorgan (talk) 19:07, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.