The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 23:11, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Python Conference (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Random conference with no assertion of notability, spam magnet, 100% self-sourced article. Guy (help!) 23:39, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as per nomination.TH1980 (talk) 00:49, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 02:00, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 02:01, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment I have added some RS to the article. I haven't investigated notability yet, but there is verifiable material. Spam magnet is not a good reason for deletion; we don't delete articles because we are too lazy to maintain them. --((u|Mark viking)) {Talk} 16:10, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong keep. I don't think it's fair to call PyCon a "random conference". PyCon is the primary Python programming conference.[1][2][3][4] The 2019 conference had nearly 3,400 participants and is the largest gathering for the Python community.[5] It has been going for around 17 years, and has spawned more than 40 other PyCons around the world.[6][7] PyCon 2020 was listed as (one of) "The best software engineering conferences (to attend) of 2020" and "As Python becomes ever more popular in the scientific community and for big data, the influence of PyCon will continue to grow."[8]

It is supported by many significant companies: Microsoft[9], Google[10] Facebook[11]

I'll add these into the main article.

• Keep. The article definitely needs revamping and more sources. However, I don't agree with the delete. This is the foremost conference for one of the most important programming languages out there. Alan Islas (talk) 16:26, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:08, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep it is a good topic, although needs more work but should not be deleted. Nika2020 (talk) 18:08, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - significant changes have been made to the article since the nomination, which clearly assert the conference's notability. Naypta ☺ | ✉ talk page | 19:57, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.