- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:38, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
QASource[edit]
- QASource (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable company lacking in any in-depth coverage. Sources are all listings, unreliable, cruft or mill. A search brought up little else. May just be too soon. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 17:03, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 17:25, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 17:25, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 17:25, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The sources do seem to be press releases, and not very smoothly crafted ones. I especially like the one that is supposed to be a profile of company founder Rajeev Rai and leads with a bolded editor's note: "Can we use this quote somewhere on the page?"--GRuban (talk) 19:58, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment How did I miss that...that is just beautiful. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 20:04, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Should anyone have any delusions about the independence of sources like testingmagazine, the "profile" linked from 20 Leading Testing Providers 2017 is discussing the company in the first person: "we are", "our CEO". Not remotely independent. Mduvekot (talk) 22:42, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.