The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:38, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

QASource[edit]

QASource (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company lacking in any in-depth coverage. Sources are all listings, unreliable, cruft or mill. A search brought up little else. May just be too soon. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 17:03, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 17:25, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 17:25, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 17:25, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment How did I miss that...that is just beautiful. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 20:04, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.