The result was delete. --bainer (talk) 12:53, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The first AfD was closed at one point by Daniel; but only for 25 minutes and 6 1/2 days after the debate began anyway - well after the standard 5 day period. It was again closed by Drini, this time 7 1/2 days after beginning, which lasted 23 minutes.
In all of these piles of discussion the consensus was clearly in favour of deletion, mustering both weight of policy and weight of numbers.
--bainer (talk) 12:53, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]It now seems necessary to expound this a little more for people who haven't understood what has happened so far. Among all of the discussion of the content of the article which occurred in the first AfD and at DRV, there were essentially only two arguments raised:
Not only does the latter argument rebut the former, but the weight of numbers across the whole course of the discussion was behind the latter argument.
I feel that confusion has abounded because of the failure of some people to appreciate the distinction between the person and the meme. There is agreement from most of the people in favour of deletion that the meme may be notable. However the issue in question is the article about the person, and that should not be lost sight of.
The previous AfD on this "internet meme"-star degenerated after several out-of-process closures. DRV overturned that mess. This matter is resubmitted to AfD for full consideration. Xoloz 12:17, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]