The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 03:46, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Qipa[edit]

Qipa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Combination of a dictionary definition and unsourced OR. Also falls foul of WP:NPOV. Rich^(Contribs)/_{(Talk to me!)} 04:52, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:23, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:24, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 01:01, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

---

• Delete - No attempt to establish any sort of notability, sources or sense. It's also kind of sad that our criteria for Speedy Deletion doesn't seem to cover such obvious cases like this.
• Query: should redirects be wp:bundled, or are they included implicitly? The pages in question are 奇葩 and Qi pa. Rich^(Contribs)/_{(Talk to me!)} 04:17, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • The 'close' tab admins who use the easy-closing script have includes a 'delete redirects' tickbox. :) - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 22:38, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - per WP:DICT, I don't see any WP:RS that might make this phrase otherwise notable. - The Determinator p t c 21:49, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Nothing significant for Wikipedia. SwisterTwister talk 02:50, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.