The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 01:54, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Qubole[edit]

Qubole (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:TOOSOON to meet WP:CORP notability. Current article is 80% about routine startup funding. Much of the remainder is the "business overview" section which, predictably for a startup, covers non-notable APIs and toolkits. Here too we have problematic sources like the Silicon Angle blog which is merely reporting on coverage in crowdsourced Wikibon & no-name and highly questionable TechPanda.
Here are results of WP:BEFORE searches. The Register covered it [1] and number 48 out of 50 in an CNBC list [2] are the best online sources available that I can find; no NYT sources, no newspaper sources. This simply doesn't meet substantial coverage in independent RSes required. Brianhe (talk) 16:48, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. References fail notability criteria as per WP:RS -- HighKing⁺⁺ 15:38, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:57, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:57, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as spam on an unremarkable private company with no indications of notability or significance. K.e.coffman (talk) 20:49, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete article tries to promote by repeating most of the body in the lead. Too soon: there are dozens of companies sprouted up recently with such buzzwords and capital letters. (Full disclosure: I worked for one of them that has already gone defunct.) If they last long enough to meet notability requirements then we can add articles at that time. W Nowicki (talk) 19:24, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Fails WP:CORPDEPTH.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 21:44, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.