The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 07:41, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quentin Wiltz[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poorly sourced WP:BLP, with some advertorial leanings, of a person notable only as a non-winning candidate for election to a city council — which is not a claim of notability that gets a person into Wikipedia in and of itself. While it's claimed that his election race was "historic" because it went into a runoff with two minority candidates, that's not the basis for standalone WP:BLPs of the competitors — at best, its historicity might merit one or two sentences in Pearland, Texas. Pearland isn't a large enough city to make Derrick Reed, the guy who won the seat, notable enough for inclusion in Wikipedia just for being a city councillor — and by definition, as an actual officeholder Reed is more notable than Wiltz would be as a losing candidate. Nothing here is a valid notability claim, and the sourcing isn't solid enough to pass WP:GNG. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 02:09, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 04:02, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 04:02, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Can't put it any better than the nom. AusLondonder (talk) 15:57, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as nothing for the applicable notability, nothing else convincing. SwisterTwister talk 23:35, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.