The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The consensus is that there is a lack of reliable sourcing to demonstrate that this martial art meets the notability guidelines. Incidentally, no one has said that the martial art does not exist, merely that it does not meet the criteria for inclusion PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 11:28, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Qwan Ki Do (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable martial art with no references and no attempt to demonstrate uniqueness Peter Rehse (talk) 05:23, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 05:23, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.