The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:27, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

RISE (conference)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An advertorially toned page on an unremarkable event. Significant RS coverage not found; article is cited to passing mentions and / or WP:SPIP sources. For a related AfD, please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Collision Conference. This article is similar in concept and execution and should be likewise deleted. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:51, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:52, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:07, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - lack of significant coverage. PhilKnight (talk) 00:45, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and GNG. the 3 sources I found weren't in-depth enough and had me concerned regarding their reliability as well. L3X1 (distænt write) 01:22, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.