The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete ≈ jossi ≈ (talk)

Radio London Films[edit]

Radio London Films (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

This page seems to be promotional and non-encyclopedic. The article was created by User:Tizes whos only other major contributions have been to create this page and include a sources consulted page for the aricle Hans Lollik Island where the first source consulted happens to be Bruce Randolph Tizes. There is also a huge lack of citations or sources on the page to which the user was notified on his talk page [1] to fix already which has not been addressed. Delete. Stubbleboy (talk) 16:43, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 02:08, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article is promotional but the company maybe meet WP:ORG for notability [2]. If kept, it must be recicled. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Caiaffa (talk • contribs) 06:13, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete unless cleaned up with clear evidence of notability. Stifle (talk) 20:59, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Per nom. asenine ^{say what?} 20:30, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete obsolete article which indicates "set for release in 2007". Red flags pop up when the only edits to this article since April 2007 are bot-driven removals of image links and the tag to this AfD. B.Wind (talk) 00:31, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.