The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Circuit de Spa-Francorchamps. After reading the two articles, there was actually a little bit more content in the parent article than in this one. I've placed the images on the talk page. --Wafulz 22:06, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Raidillon[edit]

Raidillon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

I came accross this page by accident from Eau Rouge corner, and I'm really shocked it has a page. What, the corner isn't anything special, I can't see any other corners have any articles, can you? Davnel03 15:52, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment So that's four corners with articles! How many others are lurking out there? 4u1e 16:47, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No matter what, I've nominated the two for deletion. Davnel03 16:51, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. This deserves one line in the main circuit article, no more. Pyrope 19:44, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Eau Rouge corner. Astonishing as it sounds, the Eau Rouge corner is one of the most notable corners in F1. Perhaps, arguably, the most notable. This article deals with a section of the complex. That there are two articles on the same complex indicates the interest. And the sources quoted within the Eau Rouge article verifies the corner's notability. SilkTork 10:26, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Eau Rouge corner for the reasons given by SilkTork. --David Edgar 11:16, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.