The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Sandstein  19:19, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ranee Campen[edit]

Ranee Campen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 01:51, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete-I just put a prod on this earlier and looks like it was recreated! Anyway-non notable actress Wgolf (talk) 02:04, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. lavender|^{(formerlyHMSSolent)}|lambast 02:05, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. lavender|^{(formerlyHMSSolent)}|lambast 02:06, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Subject is notable according to the WP:GNG. In-depth interviews have featured in Lisa Weekly[1] and GM[2], both Thai print magazines, as well as Post Today[3], a daily newspaper. Not to mention tons of coverage in celebrity gossip columns in both print and online news publications.[4] --Paul_012 (talk) 04:43, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Paul_012. She is the leading actress in several TV dramas that is broadcast in 8:15pm-10:45pm primetime slot in TV channel that has number-one rating in Bangkok and number-two rating in upcountry. --Lerdsuwa (talk) 15:48, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Those listed above (bar the last cite) are images on forums so can't really be used, Other than this [5](She uses the name Bella btw) I've found nothing, Her thai name seems to bring up only mentions from what I can gather so she actually fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR.... –Davey2010^Talk 15:04, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm sorry, but I think you're confusing what is being cited here. Those images are scans of print magazines, and it is those print magazines which are being referred to as reliable sources that establish notability, not the forum posts. --Paul_012 (talk) 11:13, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • That's my point A)They're on a forum and B} They're images (As far as I'm aware images aren't reliable sources). –Davey2010^Talk 14:25, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
      • Sorry, but I'm not sure how to explain better. Those images aren't being cited. The physical offline copies of the magazines (which you can find at a library) are. The links are merely to show that they (the magazine articles) exist, since most editors won't probably have direct access to those magazines. See Wikipedia:Offline sources for more on the subject. --Paul_012 (talk) 17:24, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
        • Paul 012 seems to have reason on his side. Anyway, I am now neutral on whether this lady is Notable or not. I will let somebody who reads Thai make a decision. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 20:06, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
        • Keep - Well I still say they're images but meh it's all technical and I'm sleepy so meh Keep per sources provided ;). –Davey2010^Talk 20:19, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.