The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Interstellar (film)#Production design. Sandstein 13:50, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ranger (Interstellar)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fancruft, based on the non-notable novelization of the movie Interstellar. I would suggest merging it to the Interstellar article, but there is very little of any value since none of the information other that the title sentence was actually reflected in the film. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 21:41, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect. The essay Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) asks us to consider the general notability guideline: Ranger is not notable for a stand-alone article, but since it is a fictional element in Interstellar, a categorised ((R from fictional element)) to Interstellar (film)#Production design is an appropriate policy-based alternative to deletion. — Sam Sailor 04:44, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. — Sam Sailor 04:45, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. — Sam Sailor 04:45, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:48, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.