The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:45, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rasna (actress)[edit]

Rasna (actress) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appearances in films of non-named parts failing to meet WP:ACTOR. Awards won presented by channel shows were airing on. Generally appearing non-noteable. Amortias (T)(C) 22:54, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:20, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:20, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Actress had the leading role in 500 episodes of Paarijatham. Atlantic306 (talk) 01:50, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The article is not having any reference for stating the importance of the article. The reference "The Hindu" states she is awarded for actress. The awards is presented by Asianet, and awards provided by Asianet is only for their programmes which is airing via their channel. So nothing special with the award.The article fails WP:ACTOR and WP:ENT JackTracker (talk) 10:46, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete at best as the current article, information and sources, is still questionably solid for the entertainers notability, with nothing suggesting solid independent notability yet. SwisterTwister talk 07:12, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No support for notability outside a soap opera whose article has no reliable sources. --OpenFuture (talk) 17:54, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete due to lack of significant coverage from reliable publications. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 00:23, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.