The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Enigma^msg 08:29, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

RedGirraffe[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promoting of new minor business. Glorified with business listing and opening news. No indepth independent sources to pass WP:NCORP, no evidence of notability. –Ammarpad (talk) 15:49, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 03:33, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 03:33, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kirbanzo (talk) 17:57, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Does not meet WP:NCORP; promo 'cruft. K.e.coffman (talk) 16:41, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — F R ⁺ 06:02, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Agree, fails GNG and WP:NCORP, Wikipedia is not a platform for promotion either. HighKing⁺⁺ 13:48, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.