The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:22, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redactem[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of meeting WP:GNG. Only sources cited are from the distrubutor, the game's Facebook page, and an AMA run by one of the devlopers. RA0808 ^talk _contribs 20:51, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. RA0808 ^talk _contribs 20:52, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:GNG. Topic lacks significant coverage from reliable independent sources. No hits at all from reliable video game sources. --The1337gamer (talk) 20:55, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I couldn't find anything that would show notability. There are no reliable sources to be had. Anarchyte (work | talk) 10:17, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Facebook isn't a reliable source, and when it's the page of the developers, it's also not an independent one. Not enough coverage to meet WP:GNG. Omni Flames (talk) 04:34, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not notable, quite possibly a promotional article. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 18:09, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.