The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. per Cerejota, and it was trivial to find a ref that shows they've toured the US, also per WP:CSB Black Kite 23:09, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redencion 911 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Not notable per Wikipedia:Notability_(music). --smurdah (talk) 19:44, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Okay, I totally screwed up the nomination. I nominated it twice when I should've done it once. I'm not sure how to clean it up. ----smurdah (talk) 19:45, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Fixed. Uncle G (talk) 20:00, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • Thanks, I appreciate it! --smurdah (talk) 20:09, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 05:38, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Aitias // discussion 00:00, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Keep & close as per WP:BAND #5, Massapunk Records is a notable and leading indepedent distributor of left-wing hardcore-punk and punk in Iberoamerica, including notable bands. Thanks!--Cerejota (talk) 04:37, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete per WP:CSD#A7, an article about a band that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant.Oroso (talk) 07:48, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dude, I already stated Notability by WP:BAND #5, and the article mention the fact that they released via Massapunk. Your claim of speedy delete is invalid. Thanks!--Cerejota (talk) 22:36, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Clearly not speediable but the article isn't in the clear yet, there's a discreprancy: massa or masa? The linked website for the label is in Spanish or Portoguese and we don't have an article for the label. I can't determine the label's notability without some additional information. -0 Mgm|^(talk) 23:38, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Its in Spanish. As to sources of notability, they are somewhat difficult due to the narrow appeal of the scene (remeber, notability is not general, it is about the field of the subject) but here are some: Less reliable (a blog/social network, but well known in that scene): [Congratulations on anniversary, commentary on notability - first label in Santiago Chile for this type of music etc (Spanish), more reliable is extremely notable Maximumrocknroll #303 issue (August 2008) burbled an interview with them as "Chilean record label extraordinaire MASAPUNK", and burbled on its importance, besides of course interviewing the record label. I can dig up some more. I was connected many years ago with this scene, at the time Masapunk was launched, but I would have to dig more connections before providing moar, as this is not a scene that happens on the internet as much as offline. Third World, baby. Thanks!--Cerejota (talk) 01:04, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.