The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 20:47, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relay Ventures

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Every source in this promotional article for this non notable venture capital firm is either a press release or a mere mention they have invested some small amount of money for some firm. 'DGG (at NYPL) (talk) 21:11, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:04, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:04, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. The company has a few news sources, but on closer inspection, they all refer to the company being renamed from ATP Capital, getting a new CEO, or otherwise trivial passing mentions. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 10:50, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 00:16, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The article lists what the firm does, with references to where it has made these investments (which is presumably why it passed AfC), but neither these nor the firm's name change provide evidence of actual notability. AllyD (talk) 06:25, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.