- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Nominator has been blocked as a sockpuppet of a blocked editor (non-admin closure) Jackmcbarn (talk) 01:37, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Richard Meredith Hart (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Meredith Hart Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Might not be notable.. BlakeSnake (talk) 18:17, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sure it's notable to those who enjoy Texas historyTheGr8Gonzo (talk) 18:28, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep without prejudice. The article, in its current state, doesn't make clear how Hart meets WP:BIO and is notable. Bad as that may be, an AfD with a weak rationale a mere seven minutes after the article was created is worse. I'd like to see the article get some attention and improvement: more sources, a better introduction, etc. If, after a few weeks or months, we don't have much in the way of sources and it isn't clear that he's notable, then let's go through the AfD process. —C.Fred (talk) 22:41, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:16, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:17, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:17, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't see any evidence of that on the nominator's user talk page. —C.Fred (talk) 14:55, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- How about now?—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 17:07, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.