The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SNOW... Tone 14:54, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Right Celebrity (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested prod: still has no third party sources or demonstration of notability. Durova³¹⁹ 02:15, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:29, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Completely uncited; I was unable to locate any coverage in reliable sources (beyond one source credit) --Cybercobra (talk) 02:41, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I was likewise unable to find evidence that this may meet WP:WEB.  JUJUTACULAR  04:39, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Ugh. As above + WP: ARTSPAM. --Whoosit (talk) 07:06, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete - unsourced self-promotion. -- DustFormsWords (talk) 11:01, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Not notable, obvious self-promotion New seeker (talk) 14:16, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.