The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MelanieN (talk) 00:58, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rina Charaniya[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. There are very few independent and reliable sources available which even briefly mention the article subject. Neither can WP:ENT be applied here as there is no evidence of significant roles in multiple notable films. (The article subject has 3 film credits: one special appearance, one cameo and a role in an upcoming film which has not been released). This is WP:TOOSOON. Lemongirl942 (talk) 10:49, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 10:49, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 10:50, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 10:50, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as the currently listed article has nothing for any applicable notability, clearly nothing acceptable. SwisterTwister talk 07:18, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete per TOOSOON. I take issue with "nothing acceptable," there's "something", just not enough to keep for now. Montanabw ^(talk) 18:48, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails GNG. Philafrenzy (talk) 09:05, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.