The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure)Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 06:30, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Robbie the Robot (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a valid disambiguation page. There isn't a single Robbie the Robot in the bunch. The Asimov character is a robot named Robbie (and this page isn't titled Robbie, a robot). The rest are variations of the name Robbie. Assuming this is deleted, it could be reconstituted as a spelling mistake redirect to the one-and-only Robby the Robot. Clarityfiend (talk) 09:44, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • We have Robert, an article on the name, which lists people named Robert (including fictional people), and Robbie, also on the name, which includes two robots on its list of names. This would just entail a restructuring of existing information (or, at least, permissible information) about robots named variations of "Robert". I have no objection, by the way, to moving that to a more refined title, and redirecting the title at issue here to Robby the Robot. BD2412 T 05:44, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I fail to understand your rationale. There are people and fictional characters named Robert and Robbie. There are none named Robbie the Robot, and only one close enough to require any action. Clarityfiend (talk) 12:08, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Per our own article on the name, Robbie, it is "usually encountered as a nickname or a shortened form of Robert, Rob or Robin"; per Asimov, this is a common trope in robot naming, and there are plenty of robots named an alliterative variation of "Robert". Enough for a page, anyway. BD2412 T 18:02, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 12:44, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.