The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:55, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rock for Dimes[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Charity music event with no properly sourced indication of notability. Article relies entirely on primary sources; there's also a possible WP:COI here, as the article's creator also created a recent, similarly poorly-sourced article about one of the bands that participated in the event (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Shroud of Gaia), and is simultaneously quoted on that band's website as giving feedback to them on how great their performance was — and in at least one spot in this article he wrote about the event in the first person ("our national backline sponsor"). As always, I'm willing to withdraw this nomination if somebody can source the article properly, but no matter how worthy the cause may be it's not entitled to keep a primary-sourced advertisement on Wikipedia just because it exists. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 00:21, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 18:25, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 21:12, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 January 18. —cyberbot I ^Notify_Offline 04:12, 18 January 2014 (UTC) This AFD was already correctly transcluded to the log for January 15, when it was actually created. Bearcat (talk) 04:59, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This article appears to be a brochure created by someone within the organization. Non-primary sources provided or those that I can find myself are blogs, trivial, or press releases. Might merit a sentence in the March of Dimes Canada article, but that's it. WP:NOTPROMOTION, even for a worthy cause. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 11:19, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:38, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Unable to find coverage to indicate notability. -- Whpq (talk) 17:15, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 January 22. —cyberbot I ^Notify_Offline 01:54, 22 January 2014 (UTC) Here we go again... Bearcat (talk) 03:10, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.