The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ansh666 08:11, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rodeo Stampede (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Is not notable enough to pass WP:GNG. I could not find it on any of the top ten games listed by reputable sources. 2Joules (talk) 07:15, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Striking confirmed, blocked sockpuppet nominator Atlantic306 (talk) 16:15, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 07:55, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Toucharcade review, Gamezebo review, Toucharcade followup, Gamezebo followup, Gamezebo followup 2. Not much else, so I'm going with a weak delete. --Izno (talk) 17:10, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  Video game mags will review any and all video games that make it out of the pipeline and then some. This is their standard way of doing things. -The Gnome (talk) 12:26, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  I guess you can bug me for !voting weak delete rather than just delete. Seems like there are better things to do though... I do disagree just about categorically with your assertion however, because some games will pull up 0 results. This one didn't. --Izno (talk) 00:02, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep has enough significant coverage in reliable sources as shown above to pass WP:GNG Atlantic306 (talk) 16:15, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• delete - Despite a claim for borderline notability, it's not convincing. The article as a whole deserves WP:TNT. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 15:15, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nomination, on account of subject failing notability criteria. The whole text is someone's personal work, typically unsourced. Much as I despise sockpuppetry, the nomination is correct. -The Gnome (talk) 12:26, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. : WP:NVIDEOGAMES's requirements seem to accomodate what the article's subject has to offer. But it's an essay and not a guideline. -The Gnome (talk) 12:26, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.