The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete per WP:OR; the topic is covered; a redirect is unnecessary because a non-notable neologism is not a plausible search term. PeterSymonds (talk) 11:03, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Room matching equalization (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Topic is amply covered by Digital room correction and Room acoustics. Binksternet (talk) 16:13, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, original research. Stifle (talk) 22:44, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. As per the nom, this topic is already covered. I would say redirect, but I suspect that this phrase will not be used. (3 hits for the exact phrase on google) Wrs1864 (talk)
• Delete per Wrs1864. I don't think that a redirect is needed, since the phrase is a virtually unused neologism and unlikely search term. –Black Falcon ^(Talk) 21:29, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.