The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. minimal participation, but the decision is clear enough DGG ( talk ) 01:50, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rosemary Chizurum Ajuka

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject of the article fails WP:GNG. I can't find any evidence of notability, perhaps WP:TOOSOON Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 23:22, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 23:24, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 23:24, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 23:24, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 19:14, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 16:46, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as certainly questionable for WP:CREATIVE. SwisterTwister talk 19:13, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.