The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted G3 hoax. Gwen Gale (talk) 02:11, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rudiighar von rjchthon lundgren[edit]

Rudiighar von rjchthon lundgren (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Hoax. A world championship boxer with zero Google hits? I think not. Note also that the same user created the same page earlier as a rip-off of the Evander Holyfield article - see logs and content (admins). Bencherlite^Talk 01:29, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete as a hoax. There is no way that a world championship boxer has zero g-hits. Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 01:37, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm perfectly happy with a speedy delete, I just didn't want to be the only pair of eyes on this! Bencherlite^Talk 01:40, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• G3 Definitely a hoax. So tagged. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 02:02, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.