The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete - the subject does not meet WP:ATHLETE requirements. Pastor Theo (talk) 01:39, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Russell Malton

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not yet notable, no professional appearances. NCFCQ (talk) 15:10, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. Giant Snowman 15:28, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:ATHLETE. Recreate when/if he become notable in the future. Giant Snowman 15:29, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no professional appearances Spiderone (talk) 17:07, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 23:38, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Does not meet the inclusion criteria of either WP:Athlete or WP:N to merit an article in the encyclopedia. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:00, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This player currently fails WP:ATHLETE as he has yet to make an appearance at a fully professional level (so far, his only experience is in Colchester's reserves). A Google search brings up nothing substantial enough for him to pass general notability guidelines neither. Bettia (bring on the trumpets!) 13:14, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.