The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Randykitty (talk) 15:30, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

SATO 48[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unremarkable Film Festival of local importance, Fails WP:Event. Lacks any sources Grey Wanderer (talk) 00:02, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. KCVelaga (talk) 00:27, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. KCVelaga (talk) 00:27, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. KCVelaga (talk) 00:27, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sheldybett (talk) 08:08, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:02, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

i guess im just confused...how "remarkable" would sato have to become to have a page? -historic66 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Historic66 (talk • contribs) 17:42, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.