The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —Cryptic 19:33, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

SM Town Live World Tour IV

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Yet another K-pop tour without any reliable sourcing at all that discusses the tour as a tour (see WP:NTOUR). The only sourcing that's there pertains to individual shows and most of it is not from reliable sources. It seems to me that the only purpose this article serves is as a collection of set lists. Drmies (talk) 17:00, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. Shinyang-i (talk) 03:31, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:06, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:06, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Drmies, no notable information. Set lists by themselves serve no encyclopedic values.--TerryAlex (talk) 01:07, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 05:54, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:NTOUR. Article is a collection of set lists. Could be summarized in one or two sentences in the SM Town article. Sources that merely confirm the existence of a tour do not suffice to make it merit an article. Shinyang-i (talk) 08:27, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Expand from reliable sources or Delete – Should not be too hard to find at least Korean-language sources to back up importance of this tour. Monni (talk) 20:41, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete lacks reliable sources. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 13:18, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above deletion debate is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.