The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 04:23, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Saga of Light[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced article which consists mostly of a plot summary. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFILM. Kirbanzo ^{(userpage - talk - contribs)} 16:06, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Kirbanzo ^{(userpage - talk - contribs)} 16:06, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Kirbanzo ^{(userpage - talk - contribs)} 16:06, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator comment: Concern about sourcing has been met (by the inclusion of only one source, but still) - will await opinions on the notability portion of the nomination. Kirbanzo ^{(userpage - talk - contribs)} 21:12, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, aside from the one I added, there are other sources regarding the involvement of New South Wales in producing the film, but I am unconvinced that these assist towards WP:NFILM. I'd prefer to find more coverage about the actual completed film; possibly WP:TOOSOON. AllyD (talk) 08:09, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not enough sources to pass GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:40, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 14:56, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Despite searching a few times under the various titles, I still have not found better sources than those during the film's production. These do not appear adequate to establish attained notability at this time. Maybe a Soft delete is appropriate at this point? AllyD (talk) 14:23, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.