The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. v/r - TP 20:56, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sahi (software)[edit]

Sahi (software) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails WP:NOTABILITY, Advertisement,Non Notable. insufficient trivial coverage from non reliable secondary sources. Hu12 (talk) 04:39, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete one of a handful of open source projects that may never achieve notability. When it does, I will certainly support the article's creation. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:42, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. 01:45, 15 August 2012 (UTC) • Gene93k (talk) 01:45, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSpecialUser ^TSU 01:40, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 03:51, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - no 3rd party references provided, no indication of notability, created by an SPA as possibly promotional. Dialectric (talk) 13:32, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Plenty of 3rd party coverage out there. From the first AfD: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5], and to add to those [6] [7] [8] [9] — Frankie (talk) 20:32, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, WilyD 05:24, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per sources from prior AfD and new ones listed by Frankie. Would be helpful to incorporate some/all of these references into the article. If I have time later today, I'll have a go at that. ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡbomb 16:01, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.