The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:04, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Saira Shah Halim[edit]

Saira Shah Halim (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete: Fails GNG. I am not even sure what is the claim to notability, except for being related to several notable people (daughter of Zameer Uddin Shah, niece of Naseeruddin Shah, daughter-in-law of Hashim Abdul Halim and sister of Mohommed Ali Shah)? Following are the references provided in the article along with my comments.

1. This link does not work.
2. This is not a reliable source and also appears to be primary.
3. This reference is the same as above.
4. This reference does not even mention her name.
5. This is YouTube source.
6. Dead link (same as number 1 above).
7. This link is also dead (same as number 1 & 6 above).
8. This source gives only passing mention.
9. This is YouTube source.
10. This source mentions her name at the bottom of the page. Trivial.
11. This source mentions her name and picture along with other speakers. Trivial mention.
12. This is YouTube source.
13. This is YouTube source.
14. This source mentions her name as a member, along with 56 other members. Trivial mention.
15. This source has a trivial mention of her name.
16. This source has a trivial mention of her name.
17. This source is the same as number 2 above.
18. This source is trivial and primary.

I am surprised, how did this article survive for this long; especially when very experienced users such as SwisterTwister, SovalValtos, Paste and I dream of horses touched this article at some or the other point in time; and these users are very good in what they do. In anycase, I request feedback from these users as well. Cheers, Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 13:05, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. My previous interaction was peripheral to say the least. Paste _{Let’s have a chat.} 13:25, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom Razer^{Text me} 14:17, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I agree, I may be semi-new but it seems that this article is just causing problems. And yeah, I'm also surprised on how long it has survived.Layla, the remover —Preceding undated comment added 15:10, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete My interaction was the same as Paste---an incredibly peripheral, AWB edit.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 20:13, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: Hello SwisterTwister, SovalValtos, Paste and I dream of horses. I mentioned your names in good faith and that was not a criticism under any circumstances. I was genuinely surprised that this article managed to slip past you guy; esp SwisterTwister & I dream of horses who I think have very good observation when it comes to notability. I have not noticed much edits of other two users. Thanks for your feedback and happy editing. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 06:30, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Arun Kumar SINGH Involvement with deletions has not been a large part of my editing. When I 'touch' an article I am not routinely checking to see if it should be deleted; so not a case of 'slipping past'. Perhaps you should not be surprised that it survived until the first person to nominate it (you) nominated it? No harm done. I do not have policies sufficiently at my fingertips to contribute in due form, but I would not be sorry to see the article deleted.SovalValtos (talk) 08:20, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. SovalValtos, I just wanted to make sure that you guys don't get upset because of that mention. My comment was made assuming good faith and to inform everyone (I did not attempt to criticize). Sorry if it came across as rude. Cheers, Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 08:54, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Subject of the article does not meet Wikipedia's notability criteria as KS.9955 has outlined. Deli nk (talk) 21:08, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Not notable in the slightest. 96.237.25.200 (talk) 21:35, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.