The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 00:16, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Saket IAS (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable private tuition centre (not a school), no independent references, list of faculty suggests it is a small family-run business. Fails WP:ORG. WWGB (talk) 07:36, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. WWGB (talk) 07:41, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. WWGB (talk) 07:41, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Advertisement stuff with address and phone number; delete.Rayabhari (talk) 08:06, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:30, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• delete obvious advertising with no evidence of notability. SamuelTheGhost (talk) 20:37, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. GregJackP Boomer! 22:35, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - as per nomination. Seems to be an advertising attempt. - Bharathiya (talk) 03:46, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.