The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Breakfast Serials. (non-admin closure) Steven Zhang ^{Help resolve disputes!} 00:16, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Salad pig

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Links do not mention the company at all. Lack reliable sources. Kinkreet^{~♥moshi moshi♥~} 13:54, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as not notable (can't find anything on Google or Google Books). Not even convinced this group exists: neither IMDb nor the BFI Film and TV Database mention Salad Pig, and I can't find anything on the BBC website. We could redirect to Breakfast Serials, if this is confirmed to exist and nobody wants to AfD Breakfast Serials. --Colapeninsula (talk) 15:58, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. 16:19, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:19, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect. Breakfast Serials apparently existed; I find it hard to think that anyone would create a website about a hoax TV show just to pan it. Whether a badly received single season children's show is notable I don't have an opinion about now. Note also that there is a "Breakfast Serials" with a much higher profile, that's apparently a children's literacy program of some sort. I gather this isn't the first time the name has occurred to someone. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:19, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
REdirect as above. A NN short-lived syndicate. Peterkingiron (talk) 21:36, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete, or as a bare minimum redirect to Breakfast Serials, which seems to be their only tenuous claim to any significance. If this was a notable group or notable writers, we'd expect to see a lot more outbound wikilinks from this article.

I'm also considering AfDing Breakfast Serials itself. Its main claims to fame are either as having simply existed or as being Russell T Davies juvenilia. The sourcing that is in there is far from complimentary and none of this seems to be at a level that indicates or conveys notability. We don't need an article that says, "TV screens weren't actually blank for this period, but there's nothing worth saying about what was broadcast". Andy Dingley (talk) 17:11, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.