The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Icewedge (talk) 15:59, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Samsung SGH-T619 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable commercial product. Reads like an advert; completely unreferenced. No claim to notability offered. Mikeblas (talk) 14:10, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Unless WP:N can be satisfied by significant coverage in multiple reliable and independent sources. Wikipedia is not a mirror of every manufacturer's catalog of their products. Edison (talk) 14:23, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Product is not notable independent of Samsung; WP:NOTCATALOG. KuyaBriBri^Talk 15:06, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No indication of notability. ChildofMidnight (talk) 22:20, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I can't find any reason why this make and model is any more notable than any other. — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  00:03, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:NOTCATALOG. This is a clear case of someone copying product stats without adding encyclopedic value. - Mgm|^(talk) 09:59, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.